Sourced evidence on legal AI
Bring stronger evidence to your next legal AI conversation.
Search 3,240 statistics drawn from industry reports, surveys, academic papers and vendor research. Every result keeps the source, publication date and context captured here, so you can assess the evidence before you quote it.
Updated fortnightly. What goes in, and what does not
Built for moments when evidence matters
Built for moments when evidence matters
Build the case
Bring sourced figures into a board paper, proposal or investment case.
Test a claim
See who published a figure, when it appeared and the context captured here.
Track the market
Compare how adoption, investment and expectations move over time.
The database
Search it, filter it, cite it.
Literal text match across stats, sources and context. Use a word or phrase, not a question.
50 in the newest 50, loading the other 3,190
| Stat | Source | Date | Theme | Source type | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPT-5.6 Sol, asked to assess a simple static personal website, found 13 security issues in about 15 minutes and remediated them over roughly an hour | Greg Brockman (OpenAI), "The Defender's Window" | 17 Aug 2026 | Technical | Vendor | |
At OpenAI, "almost all of our initial security alerts are triaged by intelligence before humans are looped in" | Greg Brockman (OpenAI), "The Defender's Window" | 17 Aug 2026 | Adoption | Vendor | |
OpenAI states it "cannot rule out critical cyber capabilities" for its upcoming model Astra under its Preparedness Framework; previous models including GPT-5.6-Sol were assessed at High rather than Critical | OpenAI, "Responding to the next frontier of critical cyber capabilities" | 7 Aug 2026 | Technical | Vendor | |
$3,500 Rule 11 sanction plus referral to the Grievance Committee against defence counsel for AI-assisted filings in which no case was fabricated | *Barteca Holdings LLC v. TacoBarn Newtown LLC*, No. 3:26-cv-00250-VDO (D. Conn.), Order Imposing Sanctions ECF No. 43 | 4 Aug 2026 | Regulatory | Government | |
US monetary sanctions for AI hallucinations "in most cases" range from $1,500 to $15,000 | Judge Vernon D. Oliver's own survey in *Barteca v. TacoBarn* (D. Conn.) | 4 Aug 2026 | Regulatory | Government | |
Sanctioned counsel used three AI tools on the offending brief: Open Law (paid subscription), Claude and ChatGPT, on his first ever AI-assisted matter | *Barteca v. TacoBarn* (D. Conn.), show-cause hearing record | 4 Aug 2026 | Regulatory | Government | |
Monthly questions recorded on Stack Overflow fell 99.3%, from a peak of 207,204 in March 2014 to 1,442 in July 2026 | Stack Exchange Data Explorer via Daniel Lockyerx.com | Aug 2026 | Critical | Practitioner | |
Norm Law, the AI-native law firm affiliated with Norm Ai, was operating with 25 lawyers across 8 practice areas seven months after launch | Legal Technology (Reena SenGupta)legaltechnology.com | Aug 2026 | Market | News and media | |
Norm Law named Blackstone, Goldman Sachs and New York Life as clients; Blackstone, Vanguard and New York Life are also Norm Ai investors | Legal Technology (Reena SenGupta)legaltechnology.com | Aug 2026 | Market | News and media | |
ChatGPT Enterprise aggregate output tokens grew roughly sevenfold between June 2025 and March 2026 | OpenAI / Chatterji et al, How Organizations Use AIcdn.openai.com | Aug 2026 | Adoption | Academic | |
GPT-5.6 Sol, asked to assess a simple static personal website, found 13 security issues in about 15 minutes and remediated them over roughly an hour
Greg Brockman (OpenAI), "The Defender's Window"
At OpenAI, "almost all of our initial security alerts are triaged by intelligence before humans are looped in"
Greg Brockman (OpenAI), "The Defender's Window"
OpenAI states it "cannot rule out critical cyber capabilities" for its upcoming model Astra under its Preparedness Framework; previous models including GPT-5.6-Sol were assessed at High rather than Critical
OpenAI, "Responding to the next frontier of critical cyber capabilities"
$3,500 Rule 11 sanction plus referral to the Grievance Committee against defence counsel for AI-assisted filings in which no case was fabricated
*Barteca Holdings LLC v. TacoBarn Newtown LLC*, No. 3:26-cv-00250-VDO (D. Conn.), Order Imposing Sanctions ECF No. 43
US monetary sanctions for AI hallucinations "in most cases" range from $1,500 to $15,000
Judge Vernon D. Oliver's own survey in *Barteca v. TacoBarn* (D. Conn.)
Sanctioned counsel used three AI tools on the offending brief: Open Law (paid subscription), Claude and ChatGPT, on his first ever AI-assisted matter
*Barteca v. TacoBarn* (D. Conn.), show-cause hearing record
Monthly questions recorded on Stack Overflow fell 99.3%, from a peak of 207,204 in March 2014 to 1,442 in July 2026
Stack Exchange Data Explorer via Daniel Lockyerx.com
Norm Law, the AI-native law firm affiliated with Norm Ai, was operating with 25 lawyers across 8 practice areas seven months after launch
Legal Technology (Reena SenGupta)legaltechnology.com
Norm Law named Blackstone, Goldman Sachs and New York Life as clients; Blackstone, Vanguard and New York Life are also Norm Ai investors
Legal Technology (Reena SenGupta)legaltechnology.com
ChatGPT Enterprise aggregate output tokens grew roughly sevenfold between June 2025 and March 2026
OpenAI / Chatterji et al, How Organizations Use AIcdn.openai.com
Method
How this is kept.
Updated fortnightly, on the same cycle as the research review that feeds it. Every entry is dated, so a stale one is visible as a stale one rather than passing for current.
This is an index, not a replacement. Each row records one figure, who published it and when. It carries none of the method behind that figure, none of the caveats the authors put on it and none of the argument it was built to support, all of which live in the report and none of which survive being reduced to a line in a table. A number worth putting in front of someone is worth reading in context first, which is why every row names its source.
What goes in. Reports, surveys, academic papers, regulator publications and vendor releases that put a figure on something they measured. Vendor-commissioned research is included and labelled as such, because who paid for a number is part of reading it. Legal-sector research sits alongside the cross-sector work it has to be read against, and the two are filterable apart.
What stays out. Figures with no traceable source, projections presented as measurements, and numbers quoted at second hand where the original could not be found.
TITANS Intelligence
A statistic gives you the what. Intelligence helps answer what it means.
The Signal is the evidence layer. TITANS Intelligence turns market movement into analysis, implications and decisions for legal leaders.